Loading...
Market
What will the NCAA's response be to the push for policy change on biological men in women's sports by the end of 2024?
3
Resolution / Starting Odds
Policy change to restrict participation • 25%
No change in policy • 25%
Policy change to allow participation with conditions • 25%
Other • 25%
Official NCAA announcements and policy documents
Story
Sen. Blackburn Leads Push for NCAA Policy Change on Biological Men in Women's Sports
Aug 6, 2024, 05:01 PM
Senator Marsha Blackburn is leading a coalition of nearly two dozen Republican lawmakers in urging the NCAA to update its policies to prohibit the participation of biological men in women's sports. This initiative, announced by Blackburn's office on Tuesday, is supported by Senators Mike Crapo, Tommy Tuberville, Cindy Hyde-Smith, and Jim Risch, among others. They argue that allowing men to compete in women's sports undermines fairness and safety. As the college athletics season ramps up, the lawmakers are calling for the NCAA to ensure an even playing field for female athletes by adopting policies that restrict women's sports to biological females only.
View original story
Similar markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
New lawsuit filed • 25%
Existing appeal progresses • 25%
No further legal action • 25%
Other legal developments • 25%
No change in policy • 25%
Stricter eligibility rules • 25%
More inclusive eligibility rules • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
More inclusive policies adopted • 25%
More restrictive policies adopted • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Mixed policies across organizations • 25%
NCAA • 25%
Mountain West Conference • 25%
Another collegiate athletic conference • 25%
None • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
International Olympic Committee • 25%
World Athletics • 25%
FIFA • 25%
Other • 25%
No change in rules • 25%
Stricter rules implemented • 25%
Looser rules implemented • 25%
Complete overhaul of rules • 25%
International Olympic Committee • 25%
World Athletics • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Other sports governing body • 25%
Policy change • 25%
No policy change • 25%
Further investigation • 25%
Other • 25%
Policy revised to include stricter biological criteria • 25%
Policy revised to include more lenient criteria • 25%
Policy remains unchanged • 25%
Other • 25%