Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will Funai identify as the primary environmental threat to the Massaco tribe by the end of 2024?
Deforestation • 25%
Illegal mining • 25%
Disease • 25%
Other • 25%
Funai reports or environmental studies identifying threats to the Massaco tribe
First Photographs of Uncontacted Massaco Tribe in Brazilian Rainforest Show Population Growth, Funai's Protection
Dec 22, 2024, 05:00 PM
Automatic cameras in the Brazilian rainforest have captured the first photographs of the previously uncontacted Massaco tribe, providing the world with its initial glimpse of this isolated Amazonian community. The images, which show a group of men, suggest that the Massaco population is growing despite environmental threats. The tribe, named after the river that runs through their territory, remains largely a mystery, with their language, social structure, and beliefs unknown. The Brazilian National Indigenous Peoples Foundation (Funai) estimates that the Massaco population has at least doubled since the early 1990s, reaching between 200 to 250 individuals. Funai has been working to protect the tribe's territory and uses the practice of leaving metal tools as gifts to dissuade uncontacted people from venturing into farms or logging camps.
View original story
Pollution • 25%
Overfishing • 25%
Habitat destruction • 25%
Other • 25%
Improved river ecosystem • 25%
Decreased biodiversity • 25%
Water quality improvement • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Habitat degradation • 25%
Insecticide exposure • 25%
Climate change • 25%
Other • 25%
Heavy rainfall • 25%
Dam failure • 25%
Snowmelt • 25%
Other • 25%
Climate change • 25%
Biological factors (e.g., fungi, bacteria) • 25%
Human activity • 25%
Other • 25%
Nuclear waste • 25%
Chemical pollutants • 25%
Sewage contamination • 25%
Fuel leakage • 25%
Glacier preservation • 25%
Deforestation • 25%
Water resources • 25%
Other • 25%
Sediment release • 25%
Water contamination • 25%
Flooding • 25%
No major issues • 25%
Climate Change • 25%
Deforestation • 25%
Agricultural Practices • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Insufficient wildfire prevention measures • 25%
Response time and efficiency • 25%
Resource allocation • 25%
Other • 25%
National Security • 25%
Domestic Manufacturing • 25%
Environmental Incentives • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No significant change • 25%
Reduced contact attempts • 25%
Other • 25%
Increased contact attempts • 25%