Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the public reaction to CNN's handling of the Salama Mohammad Salama report by December 31, 2025?
Majority view CNN favorably • 25%
Majority view CNN unfavorably • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
No significant public reaction • 25%
Surveys or public opinion polls published by reputable polling organizations
CNN Faces Scrutiny After Salama Mohammad Salama, Assad Regime Intelligence Officer, Freed in Report on Torture and Killings
Dec 17, 2024, 07:37 AM
CNN is facing scrutiny after the network revealed that a Syrian prisoner it reported as being freed was actually a former intelligence officer for the Assad regime. The man, identified as Salama Mohammad Salama, had previously claimed to be a civilian victim of the regime. Reports indicate that he was involved in torture and killings during his service. Following the broadcast, CNN announced it is investigating the circumstances surrounding the report, particularly the identity of the man who may have provided a false identity during the segment. The network's chief international correspondent, Clarissa Ward, had filmed the dramatic rescue, which has since been criticized as potentially staged. Local sources have corroborated that Salama was, in fact, a first lieutenant in the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, raising questions about the integrity of the report and the authenticity of the rescue footage aired by CNN.
View original story
Increased trust in CNN • 25%
Decreased trust in CNN • 25%
No change in trust • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Majority believe CNN's report • 25%
Majority doubt CNN's report • 25%
Evenly split opinions • 25%
Low public awareness • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Little to no reaction • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Clarissa Ward reprimanded • 25%
Clarissa Ward suspended • 25%
Clarissa Ward terminated • 25%
Report confirmed as accurate • 25%
Report found to be partially inaccurate • 25%
Report found to be entirely inaccurate • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Internal policy changes • 25%
Staff changes • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Public engagement initiatives • 25%
Mostly Positive • 25%
Mostly Negative • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
Moderate decrease • 25%
No change • 25%
Increase in credibility • 25%
Significant increase • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Fluctuating trends • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Major policy changes announced • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No policy changes announced • 25%
Minor policy changes announced • 25%