Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the primary reason cited for opposition to Tulsi Gabbard's DNI nomination by February 28, 2025?
Pro-Russia stance • 25%
Foreign contacts • 25%
Anti-surveillance views • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Statements from Senators or official documents outlining reasons for opposition
Republican Senators Seek Trump Nominee Gabbard's FBI File Amid DNI Controversy
Nov 24, 2024, 06:50 PM
Republican Senators are seeking access to Tulsi Gabbard's FBI file, particularly any records of her foreign contacts, amid concerns about her potential appointment as Director of National Intelligence. This follows criticism from Democrats who claim that Gabbard, President Trump's nominee, is 'compromised' due to her pro-Russia stance, her previous interactions with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, and her secret meetings with foreign leaders. Critics argue that her history of defending Russian President Vladimir Putin, opposing sanctions on Russia, and spreading Russian propaganda make her unfit for the role. CNN reports that if confirmed, Gabbard would be the most anti-surveillance official to ever lead the U.S. intelligence community. Despite these allegations, Republicans have pushed back against these claims, defending Gabbard's nomination. An expert has stated that her views are 'so wildly fringe that her potential appointment as DNI is genuinely alarming.'
View original story
Foreign Ties • 25%
Intelligence Stance • 25%
Partisan Politics • 25%
Other Reasons • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Political alignment concerns • 25%
Lack of experience • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Assad Meeting • 25%
Lack of Experience • 25%
Positions on Ukraine/Russia • 25%
Other • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Party affiliation concerns • 25%
Policy disagreements • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Foreign contacts • 25%
Alignment with foreign narratives • 25%
Political motivations • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Lack of intelligence experience • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Stance on U.S. military involvement • 25%
Statements perceived as aligned with Russia • 25%
Majority Supportive • 25%
Majority Opposed • 25%
Mixed Reactions • 25%
No Significant Commentary • 25%
Majority endorse • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
No significant statements • 25%
Mostly favorable • 25%
Mostly unfavorable • 25%
Evenly divided • 25%
No clear majority • 25%
More endorsements • 25%
More opposition • 25%
Equal endorsements and opposition • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Support • 25%
Oppose • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No Official Stance • 25%
Nomination withdrawn • 25%
Confirmed • 25%
Rejected • 25%
No vote by deadline • 25%
No statement • 25%
Defends nomination • 25%
Criticizes opposition • 25%
Withdraws from consideration • 25%