Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the primary focus of Australian defense strategy by end of 2025?
Submarine capabilities • 25%
Missile capabilities • 25%
Air capabilities • 25%
Other focus • 25%
Australian defense strategy documents or official government announcements
US Congress Proposes Alternative to AUKUS Submarine Deal Amid Cost Concerns
Oct 18, 2024, 03:39 AM
The US Congress has proposed an alternative plan to the AUKUS submarine deal, suggesting that the US would not sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. Instead, up to eight new Virginia-class submarines would be built and retained for US Navy service, operating out of Australia. This proposal comes amid concerns about risk of cost blowouts for Australia and skepticism from figures like former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who previously doubted the feasibility of obtaining nuclear submarines from the US. The Congressional report also recommends that Australia abandon plans to build SSNs and redirect funds to missile and air capabilities.
View original story
Strengthening maritime defense • 25%
Enhancing air defense capabilities • 25%
Increasing regional military presence • 25%
Other • 25%
Increase in defense spending • 25%
Decrease in defense spending • 25%
Reallocation of existing budget • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Security • 25%
Economic • 25%
Environmental • 25%
Cultural • 25%
Nuclear capabilities • 25%
Cyber warfare • 25%
Space capabilities • 25%
Conventional forces • 25%
Nuclear Arsenal • 25%
ICBM Development • 25%
Cognitive Warfare • 25%
Conventional Forces • 25%
Submarines • 25%
Drones • 25%
Fighter Jets • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Naval defense • 25%
Air defense • 25%
Ground forces modernization • 25%
Increased military presence in South China Sea • 25%
Strengthened alliances with other nations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other • 25%
Nuclear Arsenal • 25%
Naval Forces • 25%
Air Force • 25%
Cyber Capabilities • 25%
Missile defense enhancement • 25%
Naval presence expansion • 25%
Cybersecurity initiatives • 25%
Other • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Air and missile defense • 25%
Naval expansion • 25%
Ground forces enhancement • 25%
Nuclear arsenal expansion • 25%
Conventional forces enhancement • 25%
Cyber warfare capabilities • 25%
Other • 25%
Continues to oppose the deal • 25%
No public stance • 25%
Remains neutral • 25%
Supports the revised plan • 25%