Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the primary focus area for DOJ under Pam Bondi in 2025?
Cartel dismantling • 25%
Cybercrime prevention • 25%
Domestic terrorism • 25%
Other focus area • 25%
Official Department of Justice annual report or press releases
Pam Bondi Promises to Refocus DOJ on Safety, Target Cartels to 'Make America Safe Again'
Jan 15, 2025, 03:20 PM
Pam Bondi, nominated by President Trump as Attorney General, addressed the Senate Judiciary Committee, stating that her overriding objective, if confirmed, would be to refocus the Department of Justice on its core mission of ensuring American safety and prosecuting criminals vigorously. Bondi emphasized her commitment to 'make America safe again' and highlighted her intent to target cartels as part of her strategy to enhance public safety. She also mentioned a return to basics in her approach.
View original story
Increased focus on cartel prosecution • 25%
Increased focus on general criminal prosecution • 25%
Increased focus on border security • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Terrorism Prevention • 25%
Drug Enforcement • 25%
Civil Rights • 25%
Other • 25%
Drug Enforcement • 25%
Political Investigations • 25%
Human Trafficking • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Partisanship • 25%
Other • 25%
Efficiency • 25%
Transparency • 25%
Fighting organized crime • 25%
Other • 25%
Addressing cybercrime • 25%
Reducing DOJ partisanship • 25%
Civil rights violations • 25%
Political corruption • 25%
Other • 25%
Corporate fraud • 25%
Policy on reducing partisanship • 25%
Policy on increased transparency • 25%
Policy on equal treatment under the law • 25%
Other reforms • 25%
Other • 25%
Her political affiliations • 25%
Her record as Florida Attorney General • 25%
Her stance on immigration • 25%
Addressing DOJ partisanship • 25%
Criminal justice reform • 25%
Immigration enforcement • 25%
Other • 25%
Other significant policy change • 25%
Reform of FBI oversight • 25%
New guidelines on classified document handling • 25%
Changes in DOJ prosecution priorities • 25%
Criticism by civil rights organizations • 25%
Criticism by political leaders • 25%
Criticism by legal experts • 25%
No significant criticism • 25%