Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the under-16 social media ban proposal in Australia by mid-2025?
Implemented as proposed • 25%
Modified implementation • 25%
Not implemented • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Official legislative records or government announcements
Australians Oppose PM Albanese's Under-16 Social Media Ban Amid Mental Health Concerns
Nov 11, 2024, 04:20 AM
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced plans to implement a "world-leading" ban on social media usage for children under the age of 16. The proposed legislation would require social media platforms to verify users' ages, preventing those under 16 from accessing sites like TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Roblox, and possibly Xbox Live. The announcement has sparked public backlash, with many Australians opposing the ban and labeling it "draconian," expressing concerns over free speech rights. Experts have raised mental health concerns, warning about potential negative impacts on children's well-being and questioning the feasibility of enforcing the ban. There are also worries about the implications for digital IDs, as age verification could lead to broader identity tracking. Opposition leader Peter Dutton is pushing for the ban to be implemented by Christmas, despite criticism.
View original story
Passed without amendments • 25%
Passed with amendments • 25%
Rejected • 25%
Still under consideration • 25%
Ban fully implemented • 25%
Ban partially implemented • 25%
Ban rejected • 25%
Ban postponed • 25%
Passed • 33%
Rejected • 33%
Deferred • 34%
Bill passes unchanged • 25%
Bill passes with amendments • 25%
Bill is rejected • 25%
Bill is delayed • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Mostly supportive • 25%
Mostly opposed • 25%
Divided opinion • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Mostly Supportive • 25%
Mostly Opposed • 25%
Evenly Split • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Evenly divided • 25%
Insufficient data • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Digital ID concerns • 25%
Free speech rights • 25%
Mental health impacts • 25%
Feasibility of enforcement • 25%