Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the Supreme Court's decision on the voluntary display of names by shopkeepers along the Kanwar Yatra route by December 31, 2024?
Voluntary display allowed • 33%
Voluntary display disallowed • 33%
No change • 33%
Supreme Court of India official rulings and announcements
Yogi Adityanath Defends Kanwar Yatra Nameplate Directive as SC Extends Stay
Jul 26, 2024, 09:22 AM
The Uttar Pradesh government, led by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, has defended its directive requiring eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display the names of their owners and staff. The directive, aimed at ensuring peace, transparency, and avoiding potential confusion among Kanwariyas, has faced opposition and legal challenges. The Supreme Court has extended its stay on the order, stating that shopkeepers could voluntarily display names but cannot be forced to do so. The UP government argued that the measure aligns with the Constitution's fundamental duties and aims to prevent religious sentiments from being hurt. The Supreme Court has sought responses from three states regarding the directive, which is currently issued as an advisory.
View original story
Stay lifted • 25%
Stay extended • 25%
Directive modified • 25%
Directive cancelled • 25%
Directive upheld • 33%
Directive quashed • 33%
Directive modified • 33%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Petitions upheld • 25%
Petitions dismissed • 25%
Directive modified • 25%
Directive cancelled • 25%
Issue new directive • 25%
Appeal Supreme Court stay • 25%
Modify existing directive • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Policy remains unchanged • 25%
Policy is revised to be more inclusive • 25%
Policy is completely revoked • 25%
Other • 25%
Independent agency probe • 25%
State government probe • 25%
Dismissal of case • 25%
Other • 25%
All unauthorized images removed • 25%
Most unauthorized images removed • 25%
Some unauthorized images removed • 25%
No unauthorized images removed • 25%
Establishment of SOP • 25%
Sanctioning of Justice Srishananda • 25%
Public Reprimand • 25%
No Action • 25%
New comprehensive safety regulations issued • 25%
Existing regulations enforced more strictly • 25%
No significant changes made • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Support the directive • 33%
Neutral stance • 33%
Oppose the directive • 33%