Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the Supreme Court case on SC Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood by June 2025?
Rule in favor of South Carolina • 25%
Rule in favor of Planned Parenthood • 25%
Dismiss the case • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Official announcement from the U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court to Review South Carolina's Bid to Cut Medicaid Funding to Planned Parenthood Over Patient Choice
Dec 18, 2024, 05:16 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case from South Carolina challenging the state's attempt to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The case, which has been before the court multiple times, centers on whether Medicaid-eligible patients have the right to choose their healthcare provider, including those associated with Planned Parenthood. South Carolina's effort to defund Planned Parenthood stems from the organization's provision of abortion services, despite also offering other healthcare services such as cancer screenings and family planning. The state's move is part of a broader effort by conservative-leaning states to restrict funding to abortion providers. The Supreme Court will specifically consider whether the Medicaid Act's any-qualified-provider provision unambiguously confers a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider. The case was initiated by Julie Edwards, a patient who sought to use Planned Parenthood for contraception services, and is being represented by the conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom. The dispute began following a 2018 decision by South Carolina to end Planned Parenthood's participation in its Medicaid program, a move that was blocked by a federal district court and upheld by the Fourth Circuit. South Carolina now bans all abortions after six weeks.
View original story
Intervene and restore funding • 25%
Intervene but not restore funding • 25%
Deny intervention • 25%
No decision by end of 2024 • 25%
Majority uphold federal withholding • 25%
Majority oppose federal withholding • 25%
Split decision • 25%
Other • 25%
Uphold Judge Owens' ruling • 25%
Reverse Judge Owens' ruling • 25%
Modify Judge Owens' ruling • 25%
No decision by deadline • 25%
Ban upheld • 25%
Ban struck down • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Ban upheld • 25%
Ban struck down • 25%
Case remanded to lower court • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Ban upheld • 33%
Ban overturned • 33%
Partial ruling • 34%
Federal requirements upheld • 25%
Federal requirements overturned • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Legislation passed to limit LG's power • 25%
Legislation passed to support LG's power • 25%
No legislative changes • 25%
Other legislative outcomes • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Allow • 33%
Disallow • 33%
No decision • 33%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No significant change in opinion • 25%
More support for Planned Parenthood funding • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
Less support for Planned Parenthood funding • 25%