Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the Senate investigation into NIH censorship allegations by December 31, 2024?
No censorship found • 25%
Partial censorship found • 25%
Full censorship found • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Official Senate report publication
Former NIH Scientist Denies Censorship During Senate Hearing
Jul 11, 2024, 04:11 PM
During a recent Senate hearing, former NIH Chief of Staff Carrie Wolinetz stated that she does not believe any censorship took place under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s tenure during the COVID-19 pandemic. This statement was made in response to questions from Senator Josh Hawley, who expressed disbelief and concern over alleged scientific censorship. Wolinetz's comments have sparked controversy, with critics pointing to FOIA'd emails as evidence of censorship directed by Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins. The hearing has intensified the debate over the handling of information and transparency during the pandemic.
View original story
Study published • 25%
NIH takes action • 25%
Congressional hearing held • 25%
No significant outcome • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Reprimand issued • 25%
Policy change recommended • 25%
Other • 25%
Study published without consequences • 25%
Study published with consequences for Dr. Olson-Kennedy • 25%
Study remains unpublished • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Formal apology issued • 25%
Reprimands issued • 25%
Policy changes implemented • 25%
Complete exoneration • 25%
Partial exoneration • 25%
Complete misconduct confirmation • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
Shooting deemed justified • 25%
Shooting deemed unjustified • 25%
No conclusive outcome • 25%
Other • 25%
Exoneration • 25%
Minor reprimand • 25%
Major reprimand • 25%
Criminal charges • 25%
Exoneration of Fauci and NIH • 25%
Criticism without legal action • 25%
Legal action recommended • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Complete exoneration of Kimberly Cheatle • 25%
Partial blame on Kimberly Cheatle • 25%
Complete blame on Kimberly Cheatle • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Policy change on publication mandates • 25%
No policy change • 25%
Public apology or statement from NIH • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No evidence of censorship • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Strong evidence of censorship • 25%
Some evidence of censorship • 25%