Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the House Committee's investigation into antisemitism at Columbia University by June 30, 2025?
No significant findings • 25%
Recommendations for policy changes • 25%
Disciplinary action against university officials • 25%
Other • 25%
Official report or public announcement from the House Committee on Education and the Workforce
House Committee Issues Six Subpoenas to Columbia University in Antisemitism Probe
Aug 21, 2024, 06:47 PM
The House Committee on Education and the Workforce has issued six subpoenas to Columbia University officials as part of its investigation into antisemitism on campus. The subpoenas, announced on Wednesday, target interim Columbia President Katrina Armstrong, as well as the Co-Chairs and Vice Chairs of the University’s Board of Trustees. Committee Chair Virginia Foxx criticized the university administration for allegedly delaying the investigation, emphasizing the need for a safe learning environment for Jewish students. The investigation seeks to examine the university's response to antisemitism and ensure accountability.
View original story
No action taken • 25%
Subpoena issued • 25%
Federal funding reduced • 25%
Other • 25%
Columbia found compliant • 25%
Columbia found partially compliant • 25%
Columbia found non-compliant • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Full compliance • 25%
Partial compliance • 25%
Non-compliance • 25%
Legal challenge • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Disciplinary action against some students • 25%
Disciplinary action against all involved students • 25%
Other • 25%
Expulsion of students involved • 25%
Disciplinary actions but no expulsions • 25%
No actions taken • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Training completed by all staff • 25%
Training completed by all students • 25%
Training completed by both staff and students • 25%
Training not completed • 25%
No further action taken • 25%
Policy changes implemented • 25%
Legal action taken against the deans • 25%
Other • 25%
No action taken • 33%
Disciplinary action against students • 33%
Policy changes or other non-disciplinary actions • 33%
Implement new policies • 25%
Increase existing training programs • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Termination of employment • 25%
Further disciplinary actions without termination • 25%
No further action • 25%
Other • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Policy changes • 25%
No action • 25%
Public apology • 25%
Disciplinary actions • 25%