Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the debate on lamp posts with Hindu religious symbols in Koppal, Karnataka by end of 2024?
Symbols reinstated • 25%
Secular symbols installed • 25%
No symbols installed • 25%
Other • 25%
Official government announcements, district administration decisions, or local news reports
Koppal Controversy: SDPI Objects to Religious Symbols on Karnataka Lamp Posts
Aug 29, 2024, 06:18 AM
A controversy has erupted in Koppal, Karnataka, over lamp posts featuring Hindu religious symbols such as Lord Ram's bow, Hanuman's mace, and Lord Venkateswara's symbol. Gangavathi, known as the birthplace of Hanuman, is central to the debate. The Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) raised objections, claiming these symbols threaten societal peace. In response, the district administration, led by the Tahsildar, has ordered the removal of these lamp posts. The issue has sparked political debate, with BJP leaders, including Janardhan Reddy, demanding the restoration of the religious symbols, citing a previous resolution. Meanwhile, Congress has advocated for secular lamp posts, arguing that taxpayer money should not be used for religious symbols. The Congress government has been accused of removing these symbols as part of appeasement politics.
View original story
Siddaramaiah resigns • 25%
Prosecution proceeds • 25%
Prosecution withdrawn • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Fully implemented • 25%
Partially implemented • 25%
Overturned • 25%
Amended • 25%
BJP files a no-confidence motion • 25%
BJP takes legal action • 25%
BJP campaigns for Siddaramaiah's resignation • 25%
Other • 25%
Mandate approved • 25%
Mandate rejected • 25%
Partial implementation • 25%
No decision made • 25%
Further demolition orders • 25%
Legal appeals by mosque authorities • 25%
No further legal actions • 25%
Other • 25%
Major loss in popularity • 25%
Minor loss in popularity • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increase in popularity • 25%
Increased protections for academic freedom • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Decreased protections for academic freedom • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Majority believe Kharge family is guilty • 25%
Majority believe Kharge family is innocent • 25%
Public opinion is divided • 25%
Majority are unaware of the issue • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Mostly positive • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Petitions upheld • 25%
Petitions dismissed • 25%
Directive modified • 25%
Directive cancelled • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
District administration decision • 25%
Unresolved • 25%
Political compromise • 25%
Court ruling • 25%