Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the next steps taken by the South Carolina state legislature in response to the Supreme Court ruling by end of 2024?
Pass a new scholarship fund law • 25%
Amend the state constitution • 25%
Appeal the ruling • 25%
No action taken • 25%
South Carolina state legislature official records
South Carolina Supreme Court Rules Education Scholarship Trust Fund Unconstitutional, Impacting 2,880 Children
Sep 11, 2024, 03:54 PM
The South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that taxpayer-funded scholarships, which allow recipients to pay tuition and fees at private schools, are unconstitutional under the State Constitution. This ruling affects the Education Scholarship Trust Fund (ESTF), also known as 2023 Act No. 8 (S.39). As a result, 2,880 low- and moderate-income children who were approved for ESTF scholarships will no longer be able to exercise their right to choose their educational institution, a choice already enjoyed by wealthier families. Justice Hill stated that portions of the Act violate South Carolina's constitutional prohibition against the use of public funds for the direct benefit of private educational institutions. The decision has sparked criticism from various quarters, with some arguing that it undermines school choice and the will of state legislators and their constituents. The case, Candace Eidson v. SC Dept. of Education, has significant implications as the school year has already started across the state.
View original story
Appeal the decision • 25%
Amend the redistricting plan • 25%
Reinstate the independent commission • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Legislation passed to limit LG's power • 25%
Legislation passed to support LG's power • 25%
No legislative changes • 25%
Other legislative outcomes • 25%
Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court • 25%
Appeal to a federal appellate court • 25%
No further legal action • 25%
New lawsuit in state court • 25%
Further Legal Challenges • 33%
Acceptance of Decision • 33%
Other Actions • 33%
Appeal the ruling • 25%
Redraw boundaries • 25%
No action • 25%
Other • 25%
Predominantly positive • 33%
Predominantly negative • 33%
Mixed reactions • 34%
Increase in similar laws • 25%
Decrease in similar laws • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
Ban upheld • 33%
Ban overturned • 33%
Partial ruling • 34%
California • 25%
New York • 25%
Texas • 25%
Illinois • 25%
Uphold the law • 25%
Strike down the law • 25%
Remand for further consideration • 25%
Dismiss the case • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Receive alternative public funding • 25%
Remain without funding • 25%
Receive private scholarships • 25%
Transfer to public schools • 25%