Loading...
Market
What will be the main reasons cited by Senators opposing Gabbard's DNI confirmation?
2
Tulsi Gabbard•Donald Trump•National Intelligence•Mark Warner•Democrat•Senate Intelligence Committee•Gabbard•ISIS•al Qaeda•Senate
Resolution / Starting Odds
Concerns over military background • 25%
Lack of intelligence experience • 25%
Political disagreements • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Statements from Senators or reputable news sources
Story
Tulsi Gabbard's DNI Nomination Gains Hostage Families' Support, Awaiting Senate Confirmation Amid Weather Delays
Jan 6, 2025, 04:27 PM
Tulsi Gabbard, nominated by President Donald Trump to be the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), is set to meet with Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, tomorrow due to a snowstorm in Washington, D.C. Gabbard, a former four-term Congresswoman and current lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve, has received support from the families of hostages held by ISIS and al Qaeda, who praise her understanding of terrorism and advocacy for hostage families. There is a push from some quarters for the Senate to confirm Gabbard quickly, highlighting her military background and her potential to enhance transparency within the intelligence community.
View original story
Similar markets
Statements perceived as aligned with Russia • 25%
Stance on U.S. military involvement • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Lack of intelligence experience • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Other • 25%
Foreign Policy Stance • 25%
Intelligence Reform • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Party affiliation concerns • 25%
Policy disagreements • 25%
Russian media ties • 25%
Political views • 25%
Other • 25%
Lack of experience • 25%
Lack of experience • 25%
Past meetings with Bashar al-Assad • 25%
Political alignment concerns • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Lack of Experience • 25%
Assad Meeting • 25%
Other • 25%
Positions on Ukraine/Russia • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No Significant Commentary • 25%
Majority Supportive • 25%
Mixed Reactions • 25%
Majority Opposed • 25%
Equal endorsements and oppositions • 25%
More oppositions than endorsements • 25%
More endorsements than oppositions • 25%
No significant endorsements or oppositions • 25%
No significant statements • 25%
Majority endorse • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
50 to 60 • 25%
Less than 50 • 25%
61 to 70 • 25%
More than 70 • 25%