Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the Israeli government's response to UK sanctions by early 2025?
Public condemnation • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
No official response • 25%
Retaliatory measures • 25%
Official statements from the Israeli government or reports from reputable news agencies
UK Imposes Sanctions on 3 Illegal Israeli Settler Outposts and 4 Organizations Amid 1,400 Violence Incidents in West Bank
Oct 15, 2024, 02:09 PM
The United Kingdom has announced new sanctions targeting three illegal Israeli settler outposts and four organizations accused of supporting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. The sanctioned outposts include Tirzah Valley Farm, Meitarim, and Shuvi Eretz. This decision follows a rise in violence incidents in the region, with reports indicating around 1,400 such incidents. The UK government emphasized that these measures are a response to the actions of extremist Israeli settlers and called for an end to settler expansion on Palestinian land. The sanctions aim to hold accountable those involved in unlawful activities that contribute to ongoing tensions in the area.
View original story
Strong condemnation • 25%
Diplomatic retaliation • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Other reaction • 25%
Support UK's sanctions • 25%
Oppose UK's sanctions • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Relations remain unchanged • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
Diplomatic ties severed • 25%
Sanctions imposed on both • 25%
Sanctions imposed on Smotrich only • 25%
Sanctions imposed on Ben-Gvir only • 25%
No sanctions imposed • 25%
Asset freezes only • 25%
Travel bans only • 25%
Both asset freezes and travel bans • 25%
No sanctions imposed • 25%
Impose sanctions • 25%
Expand arms ban • 25%
Maintain current stance • 25%
Other action • 25%
Travel bans • 25%
Asset freezes • 25%
Diplomatic sanctions • 25%
No sanctions • 25%
Collapse Palestinian Authority • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Other response • 25%
Further sanctions or restrictions • 25%
Reversal of current decision • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Increased support or aid • 25%
Strongly supportive • 25%
Moderately supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Critical • 25%
Policy becomes more lenient • 25%
Policy remains unchanged • 25%
Policy shifts focus to diplomacy • 25%
Policy becomes more stringent • 25%