Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international response to Iran's 'Eqtedar 1403' by April 2025?
Condemnation • 25%
Support or neutrality • 25%
Calls for negotiations • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Statements from international bodies, news reports
Iran's Army and IRGC Launch 'Eqtedar 1403' Drills at Fordow and Khondab Until Mid-March
Jan 12, 2025, 10:00 AM
Iran's military has initiated a comprehensive air defense exercise named 'Eqtedar 1403' in the western and northern regions of the country, focusing on the protection of nuclear facilities at Fordow and Khondab. The drills, which began on Sunday, involve the Army and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and are designed to simulate real battlefield conditions. The exercises include the use of missile systems, radars, electronic warfare units, and both manned and unmanned aircraft to conduct offensive and defensive missions against simulated aerial and missile attacks. In the first phase, the successful interception of simulated attacks was achieved using the Khordad 15 and Talash missile systems. These exercises are part of a broader series of military drills that started last week and are set to continue until mid-March, aimed at enhancing Iran's defense capabilities amid ongoing tensions over its nuclear program.
View original story
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed by US • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
Military confrontation • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Other responses • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Support from NATO allies • 25%
Diplomatic talks • 25%
No reaction • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Military preparedness • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
No significant action • 25%
US sanctions • 25%
EU diplomatic efforts • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Support for Iran's accusations • 25%
Condemnation of Iran's accusations • 25%
Diplomatic Negotiations • 25%
New Sanctions • 25%
Military Intervention • 25%
No Significant Response • 25%
Diplomatic efforts increased • 25%
Military action considered • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Mixed international response • 25%
Support by NATO • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Condemnation of Russia • 25%
Condemnation of Ukraine • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Calls for ceasefire • 25%
Military action • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Drills extended beyond planned timeframe • 25%
Successful completion • 25%
Partial success with minor incidents • 25%
Significant failures or incidents • 25%