Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the impact of Judge Ada Brown's decision on noncompete agreements by August 21, 2025?
Increase in noncompete agreements • 25%
Decrease in noncompete agreements • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Data unavailable • 25%
Labor market studies or official reports
Texas Judge Ada Brown Blocks FTC's Nationwide Noncompete Ban
Aug 21, 2024, 11:32 AM
A federal judge in Texas has blocked the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) rule banning noncompete agreements, which was set to take effect on September 4, 2024. The decision was made by Judge Ada Brown, a Trump-appointed judge, who ruled that the FTC lacked the authority to implement such a regulation, calling it 'arbitrary and capricious.' This ruling has significant implications for the estimated 30 million American workers who are currently bound by noncompete clauses. The FTC's rule aimed to prohibit these agreements nationwide, arguing that they stifle competition and innovation in the labor market. The White House has expressed support for the FTC's efforts, emphasizing the potential benefits of the ban, including an estimated $200 billion increase in wages over the next decade. However, the court's decision means the rule will not be enforced, and the FTC is considering an appeal.
View original story
Increase in noncompete agreements • 33%
Decrease in noncompete agreements • 33%
No significant change • 34%
FTC rule reinstated • 25%
New federal rule issued • 25%
State-level bans enacted • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Ban upheld • 25%
Ban permanently blocked • 25%
Partial ban implemented • 25%
Other • 25%
Rule upheld • 25%
Rule overturned • 25%
Rule revised • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Appeal the Texas Judge's decision • 25%
Propose a revised noncompete ban • 25%
Drop the noncompete ban initiative • 25%
Other • 25%
Appeal the ruling • 25%
Amend the ban • 25%
Drop the ban • 25%
Other • 25%
Uphold the Texas court's postponement • 25%
Overturn the Texas court's postponement • 25%
Modify the Texas court's postponement • 25%
Decline to hear the case • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Significant negative impact • 25%
Moderate negative impact • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No further action • 25%
New rule proposed • 25%
Other regulatory action • 25%
Appeal filed • 25%