Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the impact of Israel's decision on Palestinian refugee education services by June 2025?
Severe disruption • 25%
Moderate disruption • 25%
Minimal disruption • 25%
No disruption • 25%
Reports from UNRWA, educational NGOs, or credible news sources
Israel Cancels UNRWA Agreement After Knesset Vote, Citing Hamas Links
Nov 4, 2024, 05:36 AM
Israel has officially notified the United Nations of its decision to cancel the 1967 agreement regulating the operations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), effectively severing ties with the agency. The notification was sent to Philémon Yang, the President of the UN General Assembly. The move follows the passage of new legislation in the Israeli Knesset. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz instructed Foreign Ministry Director-General Jacob Blitstein to inform the UN of the cancellation. The Israeli government cited alleged links between UNRWA employees and Hamas, including claims that they participated in the October 7 attacks. A senior Israeli foreign ministry official stated that Israel had provided UNRWA with a list of 100 employees involved in terrorism, and that the agency had not taken action. UNRWA has been providing vital services, including healthcare and education, to Palestinian refugees in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza since 1967. UN officials warn that the ban could have catastrophic effects on humanitarian efforts for 2.3 million people who are completely dependent on UNRWA's staff, facilities, and logistical capabilities. UNRWA's commissioner-general stated that the law would sacrifice "an entire generation of children." Despite the cancellation, Israel stated it will continue to work with the UN and other partners to facilitate aid.
View original story
No significant change • 25%
Reduced education services • 25%
Complete halt of education services • 25%
Improved or expanded services • 25%
Programs continued • 25%
Programs reformed • 25%
Programs suspended • 25%
Programs terminated • 25%
Focus shifts to other regions • 25%
Increased collaboration with other NGOs • 25%
Reduction in operational scope • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased Humanitarian Crisis • 25%
Improved Local Governance • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Other • 25%
Severe disruption in services • 25%
Moderate disruption in services • 25%
Minimal disruption in services • 25%
No disruption in services • 25%
Legislation passed • 25%
Legislation rejected • 25%
Legislation postponed • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Significant reduction in operations • 25%
No change in operations • 25%
Increase in operations • 25%
Complete cessation of operations • 25%
Condemnation statements • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic interventions • 25%
Food shortages • 25%
Healthcare disruptions • 25%
Education service disruptions • 25%
Other • 25%
Operations continue at similar levels • 25%
Operations significantly reduced • 25%
Operations completely halted • 25%
Operations improved • 25%
Increased food insecurity • 25%
Higher unemployment rates • 25%
Reduced access to education • 25%
Other impacts • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Relations remain the same • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
Relations break • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Other international agencies • 25%
Local NGOs • 25%
UNRWA • 25%
Red Cross • 25%