Loading...
Market
What will be the financial market reaction to Miran's confirmation as CEA Chair within one week?
2
Donald Trump•Stephen Miran•Council of Economic Advisers•CEA•Senate•Miran•Economic Policy•Treasury Department•Trump•Janet Yellen•Federal Reserve•Jerome Powell•Manhattan Institute•Americans
Resolution / Starting Odds
Positive market reaction • 33%
Negative market reaction • 33%
No significant change • 34%
Market indices and financial news reports
Story
Trump Nominates Former Treasury Advisor Stephen Miran to Lead Council of Economic Advisers
Dec 22, 2024, 04:49 PM
President Donald Trump has announced that he will nominate Stephen Miran to lead the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), pending Senate confirmation. Miran previously served as a Senior Advisor for Economic Policy at the Treasury Department during Trump's first term. He has been critical of the debt management policies under Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and the monetary policy of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Miran is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, where he has contributed to economic policy research. His appointment reflects a focus on promoting economic growth that benefits all Americans.
View original story
Similar markets
Positive market reaction • 25%
Negative market reaction • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Stock market rises • 25%
Stock market falls • 25%
Bond yields rise • 25%
Bond yields fall • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Negative impact • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Positive • 25%
Negative • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Volatile • 25%
Positive (indices rise) • 33%
Negative (indices fall) • 33%
Neutral (no significant change) • 34%
Stock market rises • 25%
Stock market falls • 25%
Crypto market rises • 25%
Crypto market falls • 25%
Positive • 25%
Negative • 25%
Mixed • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Stock market increase • 25%
Bond yields decrease • 25%
Cryptocurrency market increase • 25%
Mixed reaction • 25%
Advocates for tighter monetary policy • 25%
Advocates for looser monetary policy • 25%
Advocates for status quo • 25%
No clear stance • 25%