Loading...
Market
What will be the change in sanctuary city policies by end of 2024?
2
Donald Trump•Tom Homan•Border Czar•Immigration and Customs Enforcement•ICE•Customs and Border Protection•CBP•Homan•Tren De Aragua•Stephen Miller•Trump
Resolution / Starting Odds
Increase in sanctuary cities • 25%
Decrease in sanctuary cities • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Reversal of sanctuary policies • 25%
Official announcements from city governments or reputable news sources reporting changes
Story
Trump Appoints Tom Homan as Border Czar to Lead Mass Deportations, Targeting Tren De Aragua and MS-13
Dec 8, 2024, 04:20 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has announced key appointments to lead his immigration and border security agenda, selecting Tom Homan as the incoming Border Czar and other hardline allies to head Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Homan has pledged to focus on mass deportations and stricter enforcement, targeting sanctuary cities and criminal illegal aliens. He has emphasized the use of executive actions starting on January 20, including deploying teams to locate and detain individuals released by sanctuary cities. Homan also identified gangs such as Tren De Aragua and MS-13 as top priorities. Additionally, Stephen Miller, a senior Trump advisor, stated that border security and deportations will be immediate priorities for the administration, with a series of executive orders planned for the first day in office.
View original story
Similar markets
Increase in sanctuary cities • 25%
Decrease in sanctuary cities • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
Increase in sanctuary cities • 25%
Decrease in sanctuary cities • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Strengthening of policies • 25%
Weakening of policies • 25%
No change • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
No changes • 25%
Minor policy adjustments • 25%
Major policy changes • 25%
Complete reversal of sanctuary status • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Compliance • 25%
Legal Action • 25%
Increased Protections • 25%
No Response • 25%
Comply with federal policies • 25%
Resist and face legal actions • 25%
Negotiate terms with federal government • 25%
Other • 25%
Legal action against sanctuary cities • 25%
Funding cuts to sanctuary cities • 25%
Increased ICE operations in sanctuary cities • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Increased enforcement • 25%
Legislative changes • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Negotiations with cities • 25%
Legal challenges • 25%
Increased cooperation • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Evenly split • 25%
Insufficient data • 25%