Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat technology will be linked to Havana Syndrome by mid-2025?
Pulsed Electromagnetic Weapons • 25%
Acoustic Energy Weapons • 25%
Other Technology • 25%
No Technology Identified • 25%
Official reports or statements from US government agencies
White House to Brief Trump Team as NSA Links Havana Syndrome to Foreign Adversaries
Jan 10, 2025, 07:10 PM
Two U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, have shifted their positions on the cause of the mysterious 'Havana Syndrome,' now suggesting that foreign adversaries may be responsible for the anomalous health incidents affecting American diplomats and personnel overseas. The agencies point to advances in foreign technology, such as pulsed electromagnetic and acoustic energy weapons, as possible explanations. This contradicts the 2023 intelligence assessment by the intelligence community that found no evidence of foreign involvement. Senior National Security Council officials informed victims during a meeting at the White House that some conclusions from previous assessments 'were no longer valid.' The White House is set to brief the incoming Trump administration on these findings.
View original story
Acoustic Energy Systems • 25%
Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy • 25%
Unknown/Unspecified • 25%
Other Energy Weapons • 25%
Russia • 25%
China • 25%
Another country • 25%
No identification • 25%
Unknown causes • 25%
Psychological symptoms • 25%
Environmental factors • 25%
Neurological symptoms • 25%
Cuba • 25%
China • 25%
Russia • 25%
Other • 25%
Environmental factors • 25%
Psychological factors • 25%
Foreign-directed energy weapon • 25%
Unknown • 25%
Other • 25%
Russia • 25%
China • 25%
Cuba • 25%
Attacks deemed non-foreign • 25%
Russia confirmed as perpetrator • 25%
Another foreign adversary identified • 25%
No conclusive perpetrator identified • 25%
No foreign involvement • 25%
Foreign adversary confirmed • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
Department of State • 25%
Department of Defense • 25%
Other • 25%
CIA • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Military Posture Changes • 25%
Diplomatic Measures • 25%
No Significant Action • 25%
Economic Sanctions • 25%