Loading...
Market
What legislative action will Virginia take regarding transgender athletes by the end of 2024?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Ban Transgender Athletes • 25%
Support Transgender Athletes • 25%
No Change in Law • 25%
Other • 25%
State legislative records and official announcements
Story
Virginia Judge Cites Title IX in Allowing Transgender Student on Girls' Tennis Team
Aug 20, 2024, 05:36 PM
A federal judge has ruled that Janie Doe, a transgender student, is allowed to participate on the girl's tennis team at Hanover Middle School in Virginia. This decision has sparked controversy, with some community members and public figures expressing outrage, arguing that it undermines the protection of spaces and opportunities for young female athletes. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is representing Doe, asserting that the school's previous stance violated Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, including sexual orientation and gender identity. The ruling aligns with the Biden administration's new Title IX regulations that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public education institutions. Critics argue that this decision is part of a broader trend of radical gender ideology affecting women's sports and spaces.
View original story
Similar markets
New lawsuit filed • 25%
Existing appeal progresses • 25%
No further legal action • 25%
Other legal developments • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
More inclusive policies adopted • 25%
More restrictive policies adopted • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Mixed policies across organizations • 25%
Law upheld • 25%
Law struck down • 25%
Law modified • 25%
No court decision • 25%
North America • 25%
Europe • 25%
Asia • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Majority adopt restrictive policies • 25%
Majority maintain current policies • 25%
Majority adopt inclusive policies with conditions • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Law upheld • 25%
Law overturned • 25%
Partially upheld/overturned • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No change in policy • 25%
Stricter eligibility rules • 25%
More inclusive eligibility rules • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
