Loading...
Market
What is the outcome of investigations into Jabbar's use of Meta glasses for scouting by end of 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Technology deemed critical to attack • 25%
Technology had no significant impact • 25%
Technology use inconclusive • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
FBI or Meta official statements
Story
Army Veteran Jabbar Used Meta Glasses to Scout New Orleans Before Killing 14, FBI Says
Jan 5, 2025, 07:14 PM
Authorities have revealed that the man responsible for the New Year's Day truck attack in New Orleans, which killed 14 people, had visited the city twice before in October and November to scout locations. The attacker, identified as 42-year-old Army veteran Shamsud-Din Jabbar, used Meta-branded smart glasses to record hands-free video of the French Quarter during these visits, according to the FBI. The smart glasses, disguised as regular eyewear, allowed him to record and potentially livestream videos hands-free. On Sunday, FBI officials released video footage showing Jabbar wearing the smart glasses as he rode a bicycle through the area and placing coolers containing improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which did not detonate. The FBI is also investigating Jabbar's recent travels to Cairo, Egypt, from June 22 to July 2023, and Ontario, Canada, to determine if they are connected to the attack. The smart glasses were not recording during the actual attack, officials noted.
View original story
Similar markets
Details of radicalization process • 25%
Source of explosive material • 25%
Connection to ISIS • 25%
Other • 25%
No public conclusion • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Meta not found liable • 25%
Meta found liable • 25%
Shared with a known organization • 25%
Unknown • 25%
Not shared • 25%
Shared with individuals • 25%
Connection to both trips • 25%
Connection to Egypt trip • 25%
Connection to Canada trip • 25%
No connection found • 25%
Acquired illegally • 25%
Other • 25%
Purchased legally • 25%
Gifted by a third party • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
One or more associates identified • 25%
No associates identified • 25%
Unrelated • 25%
Under investigation • 25%
Linked to radicalization • 25%
Other • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Confirmed ties • 25%
No ties • 25%
Other • 25%
Part of larger network • 25%
Acted completely alone • 25%
Had accomplices • 25%
No definitive conclusion • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Foreign travel influence • 25%
Domestic extremist networks • 25%
Online radicalization • 25%
Other • 25%