Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat action will the UK government take in response to the alleged misuse of UK Biobank data by end of 2024?
No action • 25%
Investigation launched • 25%
Regulatory changes • 25%
Legal proceedings • 25%
Official government announcements or news reports
AdultFriendFinder Founder Allegedly Funds 'Race Science' Network That Accessed UK Biobank Data
Oct 17, 2024, 01:02 PM
Recent investigations by Hope Not Hate and The Guardian have uncovered that an international network promoting discredited 'race science' and eugenics theories is allegedly receiving secret funding from a US tech multimillionaire, reportedly including the founder of AdultFriendFinder. The Human Diversity Foundation, associated with right-wing extremists in Germany, aims to influence public discourse with pseudoscientific ideas, including interests in racial differences in penis size and IQ. The group claims to have accessed sensitive genetic data from the UK Biobank, raising concerns over data privacy and the potential misuse of health information. Tech money is propelling the resurgence of these discredited theories, as highlighted in articles by Adam Rutherford.
View original story
Introduce new legislation • 25%
Increase fines for social media platforms • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other • 25%
Additional Compensation • 25%
Policy Changes • 25%
No Further Action • 25%
Other • 25%
Introduce new legislation • 25%
Issue fines • 25%
Take no action • 25%
Other • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Fines imposed • 25%
Regulation changes • 25%
Datastream shut down • 25%
New regulations • 25%
Increased funding for lab security • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other • 25%
New legislation introduced • 25%
Ban upheld without changes • 25%
Ban overturned • 25%
Other • 25%
Reprimand • 25%
Fines • 25%
Leadership changes • 25%
No action • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Fines imposed • 25%
New regulations introduced • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Policy review • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
No comment • 25%
Support • 25%