Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitUS Commerce Department Considers Banning Chinese Drones from DJI, Autel Robotics Under Trump Administration
Jan 2, 2025, 02:15 PM
The U.S. Commerce Department is considering new rules that would impose restrictions or potentially ban Chinese drones in the United States, citing national security concerns. The department is seeking public comments until March 4 on potential regulations aimed at safeguarding the drone supply chain. It warns that threats from China and Russia could allow adversaries to remotely access and manipulate these devices, exposing sensitive U.S. data. China dominates the U.S. commercial drone market, with companies like DJI and Autel Robotics being major players. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has indicated that the department might impose restrictions similar to those that could ban Chinese vehicles from the U.S., focusing on drones with Chinese and Russian equipment, chips, and software. Last month, President Joe Biden signed legislation that could ban DJI and Autel Robotics from selling new drone models in the U.S. The decision on these new rules will be made by the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump, who takes office on January 20.
View original story
Markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official announcement from the U.S. Commerce Department or related government agency
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Official announcement from the U.S. Commerce Department or related government agency
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Official announcement or publication of new regulations by the U.S. Commerce Department
DJI market share decreases • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Both DJI and Autel Robotics market share decrease • 25%
Autel Robotics market share decreases • 25%
Market share reports from reputable industry analysts or financial reports
Ban Autel Robotics drones • 25%
No ban • 25%
Ban DJI drones • 25%
Ban both DJI and Autel Robotics drones • 25%
Official announcement from the U.S. Commerce Department or related government agency
Other response • 25%
Retaliatory trade measures • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements or actions by the Chinese government