Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitSupreme Court Rules 6-3 Against SEC's Use of In-House Judges in Securities Fraud Cases, Mandates Jury Trials
Jun 27, 2024, 02:33 PM
The Supreme Court has ruled in SEC v. Jarkesy that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cannot impose civil penalties for securities fraud through in-house adjudications, as it violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. The 6-3 decision, authored by Chief Justice Roberts, with liberals dissenting, marks a significant limitation on the SEC's enforcement powers. The ruling asserts that defendants are entitled to a jury trial when facing civil penalties, preventing the SEC from acting as prosecutor, judge, and jury. This decision is seen as a major victory for the Seventh Amendment and could signal further judicial scrutiny of administrative overreach by the SEC. The case originated from a hedge fund manager.
View original story
Markets
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Supreme Court docket, federal agency announcements
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Congressional records, official legislative updates
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
SEC official announcements or policy changes
No change in leadership • 25%
Interim SEC Chair appointed • 25%
Gary Gensler remains as SEC Chair • 25%
New SEC Chair appointed • 25%
SEC announcements, official government records
Returns to managing hedge funds • 33%
Retires from hedge fund industry • 33%
Pursues other financial industry roles • 34%
Financial news reports, hedge fund manager's public statements
Case settled out of court • 33%
Defendant acquitted • 33%
Defendant found guilty • 34%
Court records, SEC announcements