Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitSupreme Court 6-3 Ruling in Culley v. Marshall Mandates Timely Forfeiture Hearings
May 9, 2024, 07:30 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a ruling in the case of Culley v. Marshall, which centers on the civil forfeiture of vehicles owned by two women who had loaned their cars to individuals later arrested for drug crimes. The Court decided that while the Due Process Clause mandates a timely hearing for the forfeiture of property, it does not necessarily require the immediate return of the property. This decision, which reflects a 6-3 majority opinion led by Justice Kavanaugh and highlights Justice Gorsuch's emphasis on juries, underscores a significant ideological split within the Court. The ruling has been interpreted as a setback for property rights, with implications for how swiftly seized properties can be contested in court.
View original story
Markets
Favorable • 50%
Unfavorable • 50%
National public opinion polls
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
U.S. Congress legislative records
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Judicial system records or legal analytics services
Decrease in property returns • 33%
Increase in property returns • 33%
No significant change • 33%
Judicial system records or legal analytics services
More than 10 states pass new laws • 25%
1-5 states pass new laws • 25%
6-10 states pass new laws • 25%
No states pass new laws • 25%
State legislative records
1-2 further related decisions • 33%
No further related decisions • 33%
3 or more further related decisions • 33%
Supreme Court case decisions