Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitPam Bondi Vows 'One Tier of Justice for All' and to Restore Confidence at Attorney General Confirmation Hearing
Jan 15, 2025, 03:15 PM
During her confirmation hearing for the position of Attorney General, Pam Bondi emphasized her commitment to establishing a 'one tier of justice for all.' She stated that if confirmed, she would work tirelessly to restore confidence and integrity within the Department of Justice (DOJ). Bondi condemned the current state of partisanship and the perceived weaponization of the DOJ, asserting that these issues would come to an end under her leadership. Her remarks included a vow to eliminate partisan practices within the department, aiming to ensure equal treatment under the law for all Americans. Bondi's statements were reiterated multiple times during the hearing, highlighting her focus on reforming the DOJ's operations and restoring public trust.
View original story
Markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official DOJ announcements or press releases
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official DOJ press releases or statements from Pam Bondi
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Major public opinion polls such as Gallup or Pew Research Center
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Results from a major national poll such as Gallup or Pew Research Center
Increased trust in DOJ • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decreased trust in DOJ • 25%
Major public opinion polls or surveys
Partisanship • 25%
Transparency • 25%
Efficiency • 25%
Other • 25%
Official DOJ press releases or statements from Pam Bondi
Confirmed • 25%
Rejected • 25%
Delayed • 25%
Withdrawn • 25%
Official announcement from the U.S. Senate or credible news outlets
Improved • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Declined • 25%
No Data • 25%
Results from a major national poll such as Gallup or Pew Research Center
Other reforms • 25%
Policy on reducing partisanship • 25%
Policy on increased transparency • 25%
Policy on equal treatment under the law • 25%
Official DOJ announcements or major news outlets
Criticism by political leaders • 25%
Criticism by legal experts • 25%
No significant criticism • 25%
Criticism by civil rights organizations • 25%
Major news outlets or public statements by prominent figures