Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitScientific community response to Daszak allegations by mid-2025
Support for Daszak and EcoHealth • 33%
Neutral stance • 33%
Criticism and distancing • 34%
Statements from major scientific bodies or publications
U.S. Lawmakers Target EcoHealth's Daszak, Call to Defund WHO in COVID-19 Probe
May 4, 2024, 09:40 PM
In a rare bipartisan effort, U.S. lawmakers from both the Republican and Democratic parties are scrutinizing Peter Daszak and his nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled U.S. federal funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research. Allegations against Daszak include misleading the U.S. government about his connections with the Wuhan lab and displaying disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research. This has led to calls from the House Select Subcommittee for Daszak to be barred from receiving federal funding, citing that EcoHealth’s actions are a threat to national security and Daszak is not a faithful steward of US taxpayer dollars. Additionally, there are calls for a reevaluation of funding to the World Health Organization (WHO) in light of the COVID-19 origins probe. During the pandemic, the U.S. shared significant evidence with Britain indicating a high likelihood that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Exonerated of all charges • 25%
Minor sanctions imposed • 25%
Major sanctions imposed • 25%
Criminal charges filed • 25%
Exoneration • 33%
Censure • 34%
Criminal Charges • 33%
Peter Daszak remains • 25%
New president from within the organization • 25%
External candidate becomes president • 25%
Organization dissolves • 25%
Support the accused institutions • 25%
Neutral or no clear position • 25%
Criticism of the accused institutions • 25%
Call for broader investigations • 25%
Increased Funding • 25%
Unchanged Funding • 25%
Reduced Funding • 25%
Complete Defunding • 25%
Complete debarment • 33%
Partial debarment • 33%
Overturned proceedings • 33%
No major legislative changes • 33%
Complete overhaul of funding policies • 34%
Restrictions on similar fundings • 33%