Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitResolution of China's WTO appeal on EU EV tariffs by end of 2025
Ruling favors China • 25%
Ruling favors EU • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Case withdrawn • 25%
World Trade Organization official announcements
China Files WTO Complaint Against EU's 35.3% EV Tariffs, Urges France to Aid Resolution
Nov 4, 2024, 02:57 AM
China has filed a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization (WTO) against the European Union's (EU) decision to impose definitive countervailing duties of up to 35.3% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) for five years. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated that the EU's final ruling lacks factual and legal basis, violates WTO rules, and urged the EU to acknowledge its mistakes and correct its violations immediately. On Sunday, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao met with French Foreign Trade Ministerial Delegate Sophie Primas, calling on France, as a key EU member, to play an active role in encouraging the European Commission to show sincerity and meet China halfway for a mutually acceptable solution. China asserts that the EU's countervailing measures seriously hinder China-EU auto industry cooperation and are a major concern for both Chinese and European industries. Despite objections from several European countries emphasizing the need for free trade, the EU proceeded with the tariffs, prompting China's appeal to the WTO.
View original story
In favor of China • 25%
In favor of EU • 25%
Compromise reached • 25%
No resolution • 25%
EU wins • 25%
China wins • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Mutual Agreement Reached • 33%
Ongoing Dispute • 33%
Escalation of Trade War • 33%
WTO rules in favor of China • 25%
WTO rules in favor of the EU • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Complaint withdrawn • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
In favor of China • 25%
In favor of EU • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
No ruling or outcome • 25%
Tariffs imposed • 33%
Retaliatory tariffs imposed • 33%
No tariffs imposed • 33%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Complies with ruling • 25%
Ignores ruling • 25%
Negotiates alternative solution • 25%
Appeals ruling • 25%