Loading...
Market
Public opinion on Biden-Harris FEMA fund allocation by mid-2025?
1
Resolution / Starting Odds
Majority Supportive • 25%
Majority Opposed • 25%
Divided Opinion • 25%
No Clear Opinion • 25%
Major public opinion polls or surveys conducted by reputable organizations
Story
Biden-Harris Administration Criticized for Using $2 Billion FEMA Funds to House Immigrants Amid Hurricane Helene Relief Shortage
Oct 2, 2024, 11:36 PM
The Biden-Harris administration has reportedly used FEMA funds to house illegal immigrants, with expenditures amounting to nearly $2 billion in the past two years. This has raised concerns as FEMA now claims it lacks sufficient funds to aid hurricane victims, particularly in the wake of Hurricane Helene. Secretary Mayorkas has indicated that FEMA is out of money, which has sparked criticism over the allocation of resources. The Shelter and Services program, which provided $941 million in 2023 and 2024, has been a focal point of this controversy. Additionally, a recent $107 million FEMA grant to New York for immigrant assistance has further fueled the debate. Critics argue that Kamala Harris' open-border policies have exacerbated the situation.
View original story
Similar markets
Increased approval • 25%
Decreased approval • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Insufficient data • 25%
Improved perception • 25%
Unchanged perception • 25%
Worsened perception • 25%
No major poll conducted • 25%
More positive • 25%
More negative • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Other • 25%
Focus on domestic aid increases • 25%
Focus on international aid remains • 25%
Balanced approach favored • 25%
Other shifts • 25%
Increase • 25%
Decrease • 25%
No change • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Increased trust • 25%
Decreased trust • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
FEMA Disaster Relief Fund • 25%
Housing and Urban Development • 25%
Infrastructure and Transportation • 25%
Education and Schools • 25%
Public protests • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
Increased Congressional scrutiny • 25%
No significant response • 25%
New policy enacted • 25%
No policy change • 25%
Policy reversal • 25%
Other • 25%