Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitPrimary reason for Aylo reversing Florida block by end of 2025?
Change in HB3 law • 25%
Implementation of device-level verification • 25%
Technical advancements in age verification • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements or press releases from Aylo
Pornhub to Block Florida Access on January 1, 2025, Over HB3 Age Verification Law
Dec 18, 2024, 05:19 AM
Pornhub has announced that it will block access to its website for users in Florida starting January 1, 2025, in response to the state's new age verification law, HB3, signed by Governor Ron DeSantis. The law requires adult websites to verify the age of users, a measure that Pornhub's parent company, Aylo, argues is ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous to user privacy. The decision to block Florida follows similar actions in other states with comparable laws. Aylo has expressed support for age verification but advocates for device-level verification as a safer alternative. The move has sparked debate, with some lawmakers criticizing Pornhub for choosing to shut down rather than comply, suggesting it reveals the company's target audience. Meanwhile, civil rights organizations have opposed the law, labeling it as censorship and a threat to privacy.
View original story
No legal action taken • 25%
Other legal action • 25%
Criminal charges pursued • 25%
Civil lawsuit filed • 25%
Constitutional concerns • 25%
Procedural issues • 25%
Legal authority of the report • 25%
Other legal grounds • 25%
Disconnection from Floridians • 25%
Support for Israel • 25%
Economic policies • 25%
Other • 25%
Safety concerns • 25%
Environmental impact • 25%
Economic reasons • 25%
Other • 25%
Scientific recommendations • 25%
Political influence • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Public pressure • 25%
Diversification of assets • 25%
Other • 25%
Innovation and technology leadership • 25%
Hedge against inflation • 25%
Breach of corporate policy • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Discrimination claims • 25%
Violation of federal contracts • 25%
Decision upheld • 25%
Decision reversed • 25%
Decision modified • 25%
Legal intervention • 25%
No new legislation • 25%
Yes, broader threat legislation • 25%
Legislation proposed but not passed • 25%
Yes, specific to insurance threats • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Strongly oppose • 25%
Support • 25%
Oppose • 25%