Loading...
Market
Primary media narrative on Patti Morrissey's TDS-related confrontation by end of 2024?
1
Patti Morrissey•Department of Defense•DoD•ODNI•Morrissey•Global Foresight Strategies•Black•White•Donald Trump•Trump Derangement Syndrome
Resolution / Starting Odds
Focus on TDS and media influence • 25%
Focus on political polarization • 25%
Focus on Morrissey's conduct • 25%
Other narratives • 25%
Analysis of major media outlets and news coverage
Story
Patti Morrissey, Former DoD Official, Involved in TDS-Related Political Confrontation
Nov 3, 2024, 03:09 PM
Patti Morrissey, a former senior Department of Defense (DoD) and Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) official, has been identified in an incident involving a confrontation over political support. Morrissey, currently the CEO of Global Foresight Strategies, interrupted a private conversation between a Black woman and a White woman, reportedly triggered by the Black woman's support for Donald Trump. This incident has brought attention to the issue of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), which some claim is exacerbated by media influence. The pervasive nature of TDS within the national security apparatus is said to degrade trust in these important government institutions.
View original story
Similar markets
Assassination Attempt • 25%
Shooting • 25%
Terrorist Attack • 25%
Other • 25%
Focus on allegations • 25%
Focus on Trump's response • 25%
Focus on legal proceedings • 25%
Focus on public opinion • 25%
Focus on Crime Prevention • 33%
Focus on Legal Proceedings • 33%
Focus on Societal Reactions • 34%
Increased media coverage • 25%
Decreased media coverage • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other • 25%
Increased focus • 25%
Decreased focus • 25%
Same level of focus • 25%
Other • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Balanced • 25%
Varied across outlets • 25%
Media bias and misinformation • 25%
Protest safety and regulations • 25%
Samuel Mena Jr's background and motivations • 25%
Other • 25%
Focus on defamation • 25%
Focus on political implications • 25%
Focus on Wasserman Schultz's history • 25%
Balanced coverage • 25%
Large protests or demonstrations • 25%
Online backlash only • 25%
Minimal public reaction • 25%
Other forms of public response • 25%
Focus on Editing Practices • 25%
Focus on Content of Interview • 25%
Focus on Political Implications • 25%
Other Focus • 25%
Mostly positive for Harris • 25%
Mostly positive for Trump • 25%
Balanced coverage • 25%
Mostly negative for both • 25%
Mental Health and Alzheimer's • 25%
Gun Control Debate • 25%
Domestic Violence • 25%
Law Enforcement and Responsibility • 25%