Loading...
Market
Primary media focus on Jack Smith's report by April 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Election interference evidence • 25%
Classified documents case • 25%
Constitutional challenges • 25%
Other aspects • 25%
Analysis of major news outlets and media coverage trends
Story
Jack Smith's 137-Page Report Released Early Morning: Trump Would Have Been Convicted for Election Interference Without Election Victory
Jan 14, 2025, 06:44 AM
Special Counsel Jack Smith's final report asserts that Donald Trump would have been convicted for attempting to obstruct the 2020 election results if he had not been elected president in November. The report, released early Tuesday morning, indicates that the Justice Department believed it had sufficient admissible evidence to secure and sustain a conviction at trial. However, Trump's election victory and his imminent return to the presidency made it constitutionally impossible to continue the prosecution, according to the report. The document, a 137-page volume, was delivered to Congress just after midnight, representing half of Smith's overall final report, with the other half concerning a classified documents case remaining confidential. Smith resigned as special counsel last week, but his report serves as a detailed account of the evidence against Trump in the election interference case.
View original story
Similar markets
Reactions from Trump's supporters • 25%
Political impact on upcoming elections • 25%
Legal implications for Trump • 25%
Other aspects • 25%
CNN • 25%
Washington Post • 25%
The New York Times • 25%
Other • 25%
Lindsey Graham • 25%
Rudy Giuliani • 25%
Donald Trump • 25%
Other • 25%
Legal implications for Trump • 25%
Other aspects • 25%
Political impact on Trump's campaign • 25%
Public reaction and protests • 25%
Legal implications for Trump • 25%
Impact on 2024 election • 25%
Responses from political figures • 25%
Other aspects • 25%
Donald Trump • 25%
Kevin McCarthy • 25%
Joe Biden • 25%
Other • 25%
New charges against Trump • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Congressional investigation • 25%
Walt Nauta • 25%
Donald Trump • 25%
Other Trump Officials • 25%
Carlos De Oliveira • 25%
Human rights concerns • 25%
Political implications • 25%
Forensic investigations • 25%
Diplomatic tensions • 25%
Focus on Trump's response • 25%
Focus on legal implications • 25%
Balanced coverage across topics • 25%
Focus on political ramifications • 25%
Republican Party • 25%
None • 25%
Democratic Party • 25%
Third Parties • 25%
Trump's alleged election interference • 25%
Other aspects of the report • 25%
Legal implications for Trump's team • 25%
January 6 Capitol riot involvement • 25%