Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitPrimary focus of DOGE co-chaired by Musk by end of 2025?
Government Contract Optimization • 25%
Regulatory Reform • 25%
Ethical Standards Implementation • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements from DOGE or credible news reports
Elizabeth Warren Urges Trump to Set Conflict-of-Interest Rules for Elon Musk, DOGE Co-Chair, to Prevent Corruption
Dec 17, 2024, 07:32 PM
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has called on President-elect Donald Trump to establish clear conflict-of-interest rules for Elon Musk, the world's richest man and Tesla and SpaceX CEO, who serves as a top adviser to the incoming administration. In a letter to Trump, Warren expressed concerns about Musk's significant private interests potentially conflicting with his advisory role, which she described as that of an 'unofficial co-president.' Warren emphasized the need for Musk to adhere to the same ethics standards as other members of the Trump transition team, particularly given Musk's involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory body outside of the formal government structure, where he serves as co-chair alongside Vivek Ramaswamy. Warren's letter also questioned whether Musk would recuse himself from matters affecting his companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX, which have substantial government contracts and regulatory interests. Trump's transition team, through spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, responded by criticizing Warren and asserting that the transition would maintain high ethical standards, without directly addressing the specifics of Musk's ethics obligations. Warren warned that allowing Musk to influence billions of dollars of government contracts and regulatory enforcement without a stringent conflict of interest agreement in place could invite corruption on a scale not seen in our lifetimes.
View original story
Government efficiency • 25%
Regulatory changes • 25%
Technology integration • 25%
Other focus • 25%
Healthcare • 25%
Infrastructure • 25%
Defense • 25%
Education • 25%
Budget Reduction • 25%
Regulatory Streamlining • 25%
Public Sector Innovation • 25%
Other • 25%
Healthcare • 25%
Defense • 25%
Education • 25%
Transportation • 25%
Federal spending cuts • 25%
Regulation elimination • 25%
Agency restructuring • 25%
Other • 25%
Tax policy reform • 25%
Energy efficiency initiative • 25%
Government spending cuts • 25%
Other • 25%
Cutting government waste • 25%
Eliminating regulations • 25%
Restructuring federal agencies • 25%
Other • 25%
Significant efficiency improvement • 25%
Minimal changes • 25%
Negative impact on efficiency • 25%
Other • 25%
Reducing federal spending • 25%
Improving government transparency • 25%
Enhancing technology integration • 25%
Other • 25%
Defense and military • 25%
Health and human services • 25%
Education and labor • 25%
Other sectors • 25%
Reducing public sector jobs • 25%
Streamlining government processes • 25%
Implementing technology solutions • 25%
Other • 25%
Increased efficiency • 25%
Reduced spending • 25%
Reduced regulations • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Other • 25%
Boring Company • 25%
Tesla • 25%
SpaceX • 25%