Loading...
Market
Political response to President Ruto's USA trip cost within the next 3 months
5
Resolution / Starting Odds
Support from majority of government officials • 33%
Mixed reactions among government officials • 34%
Major criticism from majority of government officials • 33%
Public statements or verified news reports
Story
President Ruto Defends Ksh.200 Million A6-RJU Royal Jet for USA Trip
May 26, 2024, 02:42 PM
President William Ruto has defended his decision to use a private jet, specifically the A6-RJU Royal Jet, for his trip to the USA, stating that it was cheaper than flying with Kenya Airways (KQ). Ruto emphasized his commitment to being a responsible steward of public resources and living within the country's means. Despite his claims, there has been significant public outcry and demands for transparency regarding the actual costs. Critics, including leaders from the Azimio coalition, have called for a detailed breakdown of the expenses, noting that a KQ business class ticket for 50 people would cost KES 32.5 million, while the estimated cost of the private jet was KES 71 million. The US government denied footing the bill for Ruto's travel, which reportedly cost Ksh.200 million. There are calls for a discussion on the high costs of air travel in Kenya and Africa due to regulatory charges and taxes.
View original story
Similar markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No political consequence • 33%
Official inquiry or investigation • 33%
Loss of political support or public approval • 34%
No formal response • 25%
Call for transparency and accountability • 25%
Demand for a spending audit • 25%
Public demonstrations or protests • 25%
Increased scrutiny and negative sentiment • 25%
No change in public sentiment • 25%
Increased support for government austerity measures • 25%
Public indifference • 25%
Support from Majority • 25%
Support from Minority • 25%
Mixed Responses • 25%
No Clear Consensus • 25%
Supportive statements from other politicians • 33%
Neutral or no comment from other politicians • 33%
Criticism from other politicians • 34%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Indifference • 25%
Predominantly supportive • 50%
Predominantly condemning • 50%
Predominantly supportive • 33%
Mixed reactions • 34%
Predominantly critical • 33%
Increase in aid • 25%
Decrease in aid • 25%
No change in aid • 25%
Conditional aid based on reforms • 25%