Loading...
Market
Outcome of Whistleblower Claims on COVID-19 Document Misclassification by End of 2025
3
Resolution / Starting Odds
Claims verified and action taken • 25%
Claims verified but no action taken • 25%
Claims not verified • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Official reports or credible news articles detailing the outcome of investigations or actions taken
Story
Whistleblower Claims COVID-19 Blueprint Documents Misclassified by DOD, Affecting Pandemic Origins Probe Involving Ralph Baric
Nov 15, 2024, 03:19 AM
Recent developments have emerged regarding the origins of COVID-19, particularly concerning the classification of federal grant documents. A whistleblower has claimed that these documents, which allegedly contain a 'blueprint' for creating the virus, may have been improperly classified by the Department of Defense (DOD). This misclassification could have led to a flawed investigation into the pandemic's origins by U.S. intelligence agencies. Additionally, it has been suggested that the intelligence community consulted Ralph Baric, a collaborator from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, during their inconclusive probe. These revelations have sparked renewed scrutiny and claims of a cover-up surrounding the virus's origins, particularly in relation to the Wuhan lab's involvement.
View original story
Similar markets
In Favor of Whistleblower • 25%
Against Whistleblower • 25%
Settled • 25%
Other • 25%
Settled out of court • 33%
Court ruling in favor of whistleblowers • 33%
Court ruling in favor of Boeing • 33%
Claims validated • 25%
Claims dismissed • 25%
Ongoing investigation • 25%
No investigation initiated • 25%
CDC cleared of wrongdoing • 25%
CDC found guilty of data suppression • 25%
No conclusive outcome • 25%
Other • 25%
Allegations confirmed • 25%
Allegations denied • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Settled • 33%
Dismissed • 33%
Ongoing • 34%
FEMA cleared of wrongdoing • 25%
FEMA found guilty of misconduct • 25%
Mixed findings • 25%
No resolution by deadline • 25%
Allegations confirmed • 25%
Allegations disproven • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
No official conclusion • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Formal investigation initiated • 25%
Public hearings held • 25%
No formal action taken • 25%
New legislation proposed • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Settled out of court • 25%
Ruling in favor of plaintiffs • 25%
Ruling in favor of GEC • 25%