Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of Supreme Court ethics enforcement legislation by end of 2025?
Passed and signed into law • 25%
Passed but vetoed • 25%
Not passed • 25%
No legislation proposed • 25%
Official records from the U.S. Congress and government publications
Judicial Conference Declines to Refer Justices Thomas, Jackson to DOJ Over Ethics Allegations
Jan 3, 2025, 02:30 AM
The U.S. Judicial Conference has declined a request from Democratic lawmakers to refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice over allegations of ethics violations. The allegations stem from claims that Justice Thomas failed to disclose luxury gifts and travel provided by a wealthy benefactor, Republican donor Harlan Crow. In letters sent Thursday to Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Hank Johnson, the Judicial Conference cited doubts about its authority to refer Supreme Court justices to the DOJ, noting constitutional concerns and the absence of explicit statutory directives granting such authority. Justice Thomas has since amended his financial disclosures to address the issues raised and agreed to follow updated reporting requirements. The Conference also rejected a similar referral request concerning Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has also amended her disclosures and agreed to updated reporting guidelines. The issue has reignited debates over the enforcement of ethics rules for Supreme Court justices, as the Court's 2023 adoption of a code of ethics lacks an enforcement mechanism.
View original story
Conduct further investigations • 25%
No action • 25%
Issue formal recommendations • 25%
Introduce a bill for ethics reform • 25%
Other focus • 25%
Both equally • 25%
Conflict of interest recusal • 25%
Gift and travel disclosures • 25%
Clarence Thomas • 25%
Neither • 25%
Both equally • 25%
Samuel Alito • 25%
House Democrats • 25%
Senate Republicans • 25%
House Republicans • 25%
Senate Democrats • 25%
Legislation Passed • 25%
No Legislative Action • 25%
Other Reform Measures • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Internal reforms by Supreme Court • 25%
Legislation passed • 25%
Legislation Proposed but Not Passed • 25%
Deny Allegations • 25%
Implement New Code of Conduct • 25%
Acknowledge Report but No Action • 25%
Other Response • 25%
Affirms authority • 25%
Seeks legislative clarification • 25%
No change in stance • 25%
Denies authority • 25%