Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of Privacy Act investigation into Hegseth controversy by December 31, 2025?
No violation found • 25%
Minor violation found • 25%
Major violation found • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Official investigation reports or news articles detailing the findings
Senators Seek Investigation After West Point Denies Hegseth's Acceptance Twice Despite Proof
Dec 11, 2024, 05:37 PM
Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense, has been at the center of a controversy involving the United States Military Academy at West Point and investigative journalism outlet ProPublica. ProPublica was investigating claims that Hegseth had stated he was accepted to West Point but did not attend. When ProPublica reached out to West Point's public affairs office for verification, the academy's officials reportedly denied, twice on the record, that Hegseth had applied to or been accepted by the institution. However, upon contacting Hegseth's spokesperson, ProPublica was provided with copies of his acceptance letters from 1999 and 2003, which Hegseth had kept for over 25 years. As a result, ProPublica did not publish a story questioning Hegseth's statements. The situation has raised concerns among several commentators and politicians, including Senators Bill Hagerty and Tom Cotton, who are calling for explanations and investigations into West Point's actions, citing potential violations of the Privacy Act. Critics suggest that the misinformation from West Point may have been a deliberate attempt to undermine Hegseth's nomination. They also criticize ProPublica for not reporting on West Point's apparent error or deliberate misrepresentation. The incident highlights the importance of accurate communication from military institutions and raises questions about internal processes at West Point.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No investigation • 25%
Investigation confirms concerns • 25%
Investigation dismisses concerns • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Cleared of all allegations • 25%
Found guilty of financial mismanagement • 25%
Found guilty of sexual impropriety • 25%
Found guilty of multiple allegations • 25%
Charges filed • 25%
No charges filed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor procedural errors • 25%
Significant misconduct • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Administrative error confirmed • 25%
Deliberate misinformation confirmed • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Charges Filed • 25%
No Charges Filed • 25%
Settlement Reached • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Charges Filed • 25%
No Charges Filed • 25%
Settlement Reached • 25%
Ongoing Investigation • 25%
Conviction • 25%
Acquittal • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
No Charges Filed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Reprimand issued • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%