Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of McKinsey federal contracting investigation by end of 2025
No wrongdoing found • 33%
Minor infractions found • 33%
Significant legal actions taken • 34%
Judicial findings or official government reports
Ombudsman Testifies on Favoritism in Federal Contracting Involving $5.7M McKinsey Deal
Apr 30, 2024, 03:30 PM
The Procurement Ombudsman of Canada testified before a parliamentary committee regarding allegations of favoritism in federal contracting processes, specifically involving McKinsey & Company. The consulting firm, which has received numerous federal contracts, is under scrutiny due to its former executive's close relationship with Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland. During the testimony, it was revealed that government officials had bent rules to favor McKinsey, and in one instance, Minister Freeland personally approved a $5.7 million contract despite opposition from her own officials. The Ombudsman emphasized the need for significant rethinking of federal procurement practices to prevent misuse and favoritism costing taxpayers a fortune.
View original story
No legal action • 33%
Settlement • 33%
Court ruling • 34%
No violations found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 34%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor policy violations found • 25%
Significant ethical violations found • 25%
Criminal activity uncovered • 25%
No consequences • 33%
Suspension or demotion • 33%
Termination • 34%
No wrongdoing found • 33%
Minor procedural errors found • 33%
Significant improper coordination found • 34%
No violation found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 33%
No significant reaction • 33%
Moderate reaction • 33%
Strong reaction • 34%
No further action • 33%
New investigation launched • 33%
Disciplinary action taken • 34%
No significant findings • 33%
Minor safety violations found • 33%
Major safety violations found • 34%
No violations found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Significant violations found • 34%
No significant findings • 25%
Minor violations found • 25%
Major violations found • 25%
Full legal actions initiated • 25%
No consequences • 25%
Official reprimand • 25%
Resignation or dismissal • 25%
Vote of no confidence • 25%