Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of FAA investigation into drone collision with Canadair CL-415
Pilot error • 25%
Drone operator fault • 25%
Mechanical failure • 25%
Other • 25%
FAA official announcements or reports
Canadair CL-415 Super Scooper Grounded After Drone Collision Over Palisades Fire, FAA Investigates
Jan 10, 2025, 04:02 AM
A firefighting aircraft, identified as a Canadair CL-415 Super Scooper, collided with a civilian drone while operating over the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles, California on January 9, 2025. The collision resulted in damage to the aircraft, including a hole in its wing, which led to the grounding of the Super Scooper. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is investigating the incident, which occurred despite a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) in place over the area. The FAA has emphasized that flying drones in the midst of firefighting efforts is a federal crime, punishable by up to 12 months in prison and a civil penalty of up to $75,000. The incident temporarily grounded all firefighting aircraft on the Palisades fire, impacting the firefighting efforts against the blaze that has burned 19,978 acres and destroyed over 9,000 structures. The Super Scoopers are capable of scooping 1,600 gallons of water from the ocean for firefighting, and their grounding was a significant setback for Cal Fire's operations.
View original story
Other outcome • 25%
Drone operator charged • 25%
No charges filed • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Pilot identified but not penalized • 25%
Pilot identified and penalized • 25%
Pilot not identified • 25%
Drone operator not identified • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Drone operator identified but not penalized • 25%
Drone operator identified and penalized • 25%
Issue new drone regulations • 25%
Identify and charge operator • 25%
Increase public awareness campaigns • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other • 25%
Identified as a security threat • 25%
Identified as harmless • 25%
No conclusion reached • 25%
Pilot error • 25%
Other • 25%
Technical malfunction • 25%
Weather-related cause • 25%
Technical malfunction • 25%
Other • 25%
Weather conditions • 25%
Pilot error • 25%
Human error • 25%
Other • 25%
Procedural failure • 25%
Technical malfunction • 25%
Pilot error • 25%
Air traffic control error • 25%
Other • 25%
Mechanical failure • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No changes • 25%
Stricter regulations • 25%
Same regulations • 25%
Looser regulations • 25%