Loading...
Market
Outcome of China's Anti-Dumping Investigation into Engineering Chemicals by End of 2024
4
China•European Union•United States•Japan•Taiwan•EU•Chinese Ministry of Commerce•Chinese government•Chinese
Resolution / Starting Odds
Tariffs imposed • 33%
No action taken • 33%
Subsidies offered to domestic producers • 34%
Final report or announcement from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce
Story
China Launches Anti-Dumping Probe into Chemicals Amid Escalating Trade Tensions with EU on May 18, 2024
May 19, 2024, 02:34 AM
China has initiated an anti-dumping investigation into polyformaldehyde copolymers, a type of engineering chemical, imported from the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Taiwan. This move comes amid escalating trade tensions between China and the EU, with both sides threatening retaliatory measures. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce announced the probe on Sunday, May 18, 2024, highlighting the potential for significant impacts on industries that use these chemicals, which can partially replace metals like copper and zinc. The investigation follows warnings from the Chinese government about potential countermeasures if the EU continues its anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese companies, particularly in the electric vehicle sector. China has specifically mentioned potential retaliation against EU wine and dairy products.
View original story
Similar markets
Tariffs imposed • 25%
No tariffs imposed • 25%
Negotiated settlement • 25%
Investigation extended • 25%
Subsidies found to be unfair • 33%
No unfair subsidies found • 33%
Investigation extended • 34%
Subsidies deemed unfair • 34%
No action taken • 33%
Negotiations lead to changes in subsidies • 33%
Retaliatory tariffs • 33%
Negotiations for tariff reductions • 33%
No significant response • 34%
No actionable evidence found • 33%
Evidence of minor violations found • 33%
Evidence of significant collusion found • 34%
Tariffs • 33%
Trade restrictions • 33%
No action taken • 34%
Price increase in polyformaldehyde • 33%
Supply chain disruptions • 33%
No significant change • 34%
Retaliatory tariffs • 33%
Negotiations with EU • 33%
No significant response • 33%
Fines imposed • 33%
Operations restricted • 33%
No penalties • 34%
No action taken • 33%
Tariff adjustments recommended • 33%
Sanctions against either party • 34%
No evidence found • 33%
Evidence of price fixing found • 33%
Inconclusive results • 34%