Loading...
Market
National response to electoral fraud post-Farrukhabad incident
4
BJP•Mukesh Rajput•Uttar Pradesh•Farrukhabad Lok Sabha constituency•Samajwadi Party•Congress•RJD•TMC•Navdeep Rinwa•IPC•RP Act 1951•Nayagaon•Etah
Resolution / Starting Odds
Enhanced electoral fraud prevention measures implemented • 33%
No significant change in electoral fraud prevention measures • 33%
Increased public campaigns for electoral integrity • 33%
Legislation records and national news outlets
Story
UP CEO Orders Repolling in Farrukhabad After Viral Video Shows Multiple Votes for BJP Candidate Mukesh Rajput
May 19, 2024, 04:52 PM
A video showing a youngster voting eight times for BJP candidate Mukesh Rajput in Uttar Pradesh's Farrukhabad Lok Sabha constituency has gone viral. The incident, which occurred on May 13, has led to widespread concerns and calls for action from political parties including the Samajwadi Party, Congress, RJD, and TMC. The Uttar Pradesh Chief Electoral Officer, Navdeep Rinwa, has confirmed that an FIR has been registered under sections 171-F and 419 of the IPC, and sections 128, 132, and 136 of the RP Act 1951 at Nayagaon police station in Etah district. The accused has been arrested, and repolling has been recommended at the affected polling station.
View original story
Similar markets
Significantly reduced fraud • 33%
No significant change • 33%
Increased reported fraud • 34%
Strengthening cybersecurity • 33%
Creating new legislation • 33%
Enhanced international cooperation • 33%
Increased perceived fairness • 33%
No change in perceived fairness • 33%
Decreased perceived fairness • 33%
Increased Voter Turnout • 25%
Decreased Voter Turnout • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Increased Voting Disputes • 25%
Significantly reduced • 33%
Moderately reduced • 33%
No significant change • 34%
Significant Increase in Monitoring • 33%
Moderate Changes • 33%
No Change • 34%
New monitoring mechanisms • 33%
Penalties for involved parties • 33%
No significant action • 34%
Improved • 50%
Unchanged/Deteriorated • 50%
Negative impact on incumbent party • 33%
No significant impact on election outcomes • 33%
Increased voter turnout due to scandal awareness • 34%
Significant Impact • 33%
Moderate Impact • 33%
Minimal Impact • 33%
Legislation Introduced • 33%
Public Awareness Campaigns • 33%
No Significant Action • 34%