Who will be the most significant humanitarian aid provider in Gaza by June 30, 2025?
UNRWA • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
Local NGOs • 25%
Other international NGOs • 25%
Reports from international aid organizations or news agencies
UNRWA Halts Gaza Aid via Kerem Shalom Amid Looting and Security Concerns
Dec 1, 2024, 10:25 AM
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has announced the suspension of aid deliveries through the Kerem Shalom crossing, a key route for humanitarian supplies into Gaza. The decision was made due to escalating security concerns, including looting by armed groups and the dangerous conditions on the route. UNRWA's chief stated that the suspension comes at a time when hunger in Gaza is rapidly worsening. Attempts to deliver food trucks through the crossing were thwarted by armed groups, with looting reported. The cost of basic goods has reportedly increased by over 1000%, and the ongoing blockade and logistical challenges have rendered humanitarian operations nearly impossible. This has exacerbated the dire situation for Gaza's population, which heavily depends on aid for survival.
View original story
USAID • 25%
Other • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Turkey • 25%
Qatar • 25%
European Union • 25%
United States • 25%
Local NGOs • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
UNRWA • 25%
Other • 25%
Other international NGOs • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
Local NGOs • 25%
United Nations • 25%
UNRWA • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Other • 25%
European Union • 25%
Other • 25%
Egypt • 25%
United States • 25%
Other • 25%
United States • 25%
Arab League • 25%
European Union • 25%
Other • 25%
United Kingdom • 25%
European Union • 25%
United States • 25%
Increased security measures • 25%
Reduction in operations • 25%
No change in operations • 25%
Cease of operations • 25%
Moderate increase in aid • 25%
Significant increase in aid • 25%
No change in aid • 25%
Decrease in aid • 25%
No significant aid delivered • 25%
Aid successfully delivered • 25%
Aid partially delivered • 25%
Aid delivery disrupted • 25%
Aid flow decreased • 25%
Aid flow increased • 25%
Aid flow unchanged • 25%
Aid flow stopped • 25%
Local negotiations with armed groups • 25%
Other • 25%
Improved security conditions • 25%
International diplomatic intervention • 25%