What will be the public perception of AI's impact on longevity science by end of 2025?
Very Positive • 25%
Somewhat Positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Surveys or studies published by reputable organizations or research institutions
OpenAI and Retro Biosciences Use GPT-4b Micro to Enhance Longevity Science by Re-engineering Yamanaka Factors
Jan 17, 2025, 06:37 PM
OpenAI has collaborated with Retro Biosciences to develop an AI model named GPT-4b micro, aimed at enhancing longevity science. The model focuses on re-engineering Yamanaka factors, a set of proteins crucial for converting regular cells into stem cells. This collaboration, which began about a year ago, is part of Retro's broader goal to extend the human lifespan by a decade. The model has been used to suggest modifications to the Yamanaka factors, resulting in versions that are reportedly more than 50 times as effective in cellular reprogramming. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, who personally invested $180 million in Retro in 2022, did not directly participate in the project. The companies plan to publish their research findings, although the model remains a demonstration rather than a product available for public use.
View original story
Mixed opinions • 25%
Decreased concern • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased concern • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Majority Acceptable • 25%
Evenly Divided • 25%
No Clear Consensus • 25%
Majority Unacceptable • 25%
Mixed views • 25%
Improved perception • 25%
No change • 25%
Worsened perception • 25%
Cautiously optimistic • 25%
Largely indifferent • 25%
Widely accepted and positive • 25%
Skeptical or negative • 25%
Improved • 25%
Worsened • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Uncertain • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Mostly supportive • 25%
Mostly opposed • 25%
Other opinions • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
Worsened perception • 25%
Unchanged perception • 25%
Improved perception • 25%
Negative • 25%
Positive • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Moderate negative impact • 25%
Significant negative impact • 25%
Improved reputation • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Mostly Negative • 25%
Mostly Positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Job displacement • 25%
Privacy issues • 25%
Ethical concerns • 25%
Accuracy of replication • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Significant Improvement • 25%
Harmful Effects • 25%
No Improvement • 25%
Moderate Improvement • 25%