What will be the outcome of Meta's 'Notas de contexto' in the US by mid-2025?
Successful implementation • 25%
Partial success • 25%
Failure • 25%
Abandoned • 25%
Meta's reports or major news outlets
EU Rejects Zuckerberg's Censorship Claims, Continues Fact-Checking Amid US Changes
Jan 8, 2025, 02:10 PM
The European Union has categorically rejected accusations of censorship made by Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, following his announcement that the company would end its digital fact-checking program in the United States. The EU emphasized that content moderation does not equate to censorship, highlighting that the Digital Services Act (DSA) focuses on freedom of expression while requiring the removal of illegal content. Zuckerberg's comments came after a dinner with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, and he criticized EU laws, including the Digital Markets Law (DML) and Digital Services Law (DSL), as institutionalizing censorship. The EU's response was firm, with spokesperson Paula Pinho stating that the bloc categorically rejects any accusation of censorship on its part. Meanwhile, Meta has confirmed it will continue fact-checking in the European Union, including in countries like the Netherlands, and will replace its U.S. fact-checking with a 'Notas de contexto' system similar to that used by X.
View original story
Indifferent • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Mostly Positive • 25%
Mostly Negative • 25%
Instagram • 25%
Facebook • 25%
Threads • 25%
Equal Impact Across Platforms • 25%
Policy Change in Meta • 25%
No Change • 25%
Other Outcome • 25%
New Partnership Announced • 25%
No change • 25%
Significantly increased • 25%
Slightly increased • 25%
Decreased • 25%
Other • 25%
Satisfactory explanation • 25%
Unsatisfactory explanation • 25%
No response • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Successful with clear policy benefits • 25%
Backfires with negative consequences • 25%
Moderately successful with some benefits • 25%
Unsuccessful with no clear benefits • 25%
Increased influence • 25%
No change • 25%
Backlash • 25%
Decreased influence • 25%
Widely Negative • 25%
No Significant Feedback • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Widely Positive • 25%
Strained relationship • 25%
Uncertain • 25%
Improved relationship • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Censorship accusations • 25%
Other • 25%
Monopoly practices • 25%
Privacy concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Illegal content removal • 25%
Misinformation control • 25%
Data privacy violations • 25%