What will be the outcome of DOGE's strategy under Elon Musk by December 31, 2025?
Significant policy changes • 25%
Increased technology integration • 25%
No major changes • 25%
DOGE disbanded • 25%
Official reports or public statements from DOGE or related government entities
Vivek Ramaswamy Clarifies DOGE Departure as Mutual, Denies Being Fired by Musk, Eyes Ohio Governor Race
Jan 28, 2025, 01:57 AM
Vivek Ramaswamy has clarified his departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), denying rumors of being fired by Elon Musk. Ramaswamy, who co-chaired DOGE with Musk following President Donald Trump's appointment after the November election, stated that his exit was the result of a mutual discussion due to differing approaches. Ramaswamy focused on a constitutional law and legislative-based approach, while Musk concentrated on a technology-driven strategy. Ramaswamy expressed no ill will towards Musk, wishing him well and emphasizing a 'divide and conquer' strategy to save the country. Ramaswamy also mentioned his upcoming announcement regarding his pursuit of elected office, specifically for the position of governor of Ohio. He praised Trump's actions during his first week in office and noted that his tenure at DOGE lasted about three Scaramuccis.
View original story
Other • 25%
Significant efficiency improvement • 25%
Minimal changes • 25%
Negative impact on efficiency • 25%
Plan abandoned • 25%
Plan fully implemented • 25%
Partially implemented • 25%
Implementation ongoing • 25%
Negative impact reported • 25%
No improvements reported • 25%
Moderate improvements reported • 25%
Significant improvements reported • 25%
Successful implementation • 25%
Partially successful • 25%
Unsuccessful • 25%
Discontinued • 25%
Other • 25%
Tax policy reform • 25%
Energy efficiency initiative • 25%
Government spending cuts • 25%
Public sector innovation • 25%
Government cost-cutting • 25%
Technology efficiency • 25%
Other • 25%
Partial compliance • 25%
Full compliance • 25%
Unclear outcome • 25%
Non-compliance • 25%
Environmental Efficiency • 25%
Digital Infrastructure • 25%
Government Efficiency Tools • 25%
Other • 25%
No Influence • 25%
Minimal Influence • 25%
Significant Influence • 25%
Moderate Influence • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Significant public backlash • 25%
Widespread public support • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Seen as neutral • 25%
Seen as a positive move • 25%
No clear consensus • 25%
Seen as a negative move • 25%