Market
What will be the international response to the manifesto's war crime claims by June 30, 2025?
2
Tesla Cybertruck explosion•Trump Hotel•Las Vegas•Sam Shoemate•Navy•Shawn Ryan•Afghanistan•China•Livelsberger•Special Forces•FBI
Resolution / Starting Odds
UN investigation launched • 25%
US government response only • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other • 25%
Statements from governments or international organizations
Story
Matthew Livelsberger's Manifesto Alleges Advanced Drone Tech Before Cybertruck Explosion at Trump Hotel Las Vegas on December 31st
Jan 3, 2025, 09:03 PM
Matthew A. Livelsberger, identified as the perpetrator of the Tesla Cybertruck explosion at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, sent a manifesto to retired U.S. Army intelligence officer Sam Shoemate before the incident on December 31st. The manifesto, which was also shared with former Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan, alleges the use of advanced drone technology, U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan, and claims that China uses 'gravitic propulsion systems' in drones. Livelsberger, a Master Sergeant and former Special Forces soldier, stated in the email that he was being tracked by the FBI and mentioned possessing a 'massive VBIED [vehicle borne IED].' The explosion, described as a suicide attack, occurred on New Year's Eve, and the manifesto has been passed along to the FBI for further investigation.
View original story
Similar markets
No significant action • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation of Ukraine • 25%
Condemnation of Russia • 25%
Calls for ceasefire • 25%
UN Peacekeeping mission deployed • 25%
Economic sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic interventions only • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
Increased sanctions on Russia • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Increased military aid to Ukraine • 25%
Diplomatic pressure • 25%
Sanctions on Israel • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Condemn ICC decision • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Support ICC decision • 25%
Condemnation from international bodies • 25%
Support for Colombia's efforts • 25%
Increased international scrutiny • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Condemnation of Hamas • 25%
Call for immediate ceasefire • 25%
Condemnation of Israel • 25%
No significant response • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Imposition of sanctions • 25%
Call for further investigation • 25%
Condemnation of Hamas • 25%
Humanitarian aid increase • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%