What will be the impact of Trump's water order on Southern California by end of 2025?
Increased water supply, no significant environmental impact • 25%
Increased water supply, significant environmental impact • 25%
No significant change in water supply • 25%
Decreased water supply • 25%
Reports from environmental agencies, water management authorities, and news outlets
Trump Signs Executive Order to Redirect 100 Billion Gallons of Water to Southern California, Prioritizing Delta Smelt Protection
Jan 21, 2025, 01:49 AM
On January 21, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Putting People over Fish: Stopping Radical Environmentalism to Provide Water to Southern California." This action aims to prioritize the water needs of Southern Californians by redirecting water resources that were previously allocated to protect the delta smelt fish. The order is expected to allow for the delivery of up to 100 billion gallons of water per year to the region, which has been facing challenges related to water scarcity and wildfires. The move has been interpreted as a reversal of policies implemented by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who had focused on environmental protections. Trump's directive is seen as a significant shift in water management strategy for Southern California.
View original story
No further developments • 25%
Agreement reached • 25%
Legal action taken • 25%
Continued dispute • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Disapprove • 25%
Approve • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No opinion • 25%
Newsom alters policies • 25%
Trump issues apology • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No significant resolution • 25%
Newsom prevails with state-led initiatives • 25%
Trump prevails with federal intervention • 25%
Compromise reached • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
New policy prioritizing endangered species • 25%
Policy change in favor of water restoration • 25%
Policy remains unchanged • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Policy modification • 25%
Other • 25%
No change • 25%
Policy reversal • 25%
No Change • 25%
Other • 25%
State Policy Change • 25%
Federal Intervention • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Legal action • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Negotiations with government • 25%
Public campaigns • 25%