What will be the impact of Biden's offshore drilling ban on U.S. oil production by end of 2025?
Significant decrease • 25%
Moderate decrease • 25%
No change • 25%
Significant Decrease • 25%
Moderate Decrease • 25%
No Change • 25%
Increase • 25%
Reports from the U.S. Energy Information Administration or similar authoritative bodies
Biden to Ban New Offshore Drilling in Atlantic and Pacific, Proposes 20-Year Ban in Nevada's Ruby Mountains
Jan 2, 2025, 06:30 PM
President Joe Biden is preparing to issue an executive order that would permanently ban new offshore oil and gas development in some U.S. coastal waters, specifically in parts of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. This move, expected to be announced within days, aims to lock in protections for sensitive marine areas that would be difficult for the incoming Trump administration to revoke. The decree is based on the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, which allows the president to protect federal waters from oil and gas leasing without explicitly providing a mechanism for revoking such protections. This action is part of Biden's broader effort to safeguard environmental policies before leaving office, amidst pressure from congressional Democrats and environmental groups to maximize protections against offshore drilling. Additionally, the Biden administration has proposed a 20-year ban on oil, gas, and geothermal leases in 264,000 acres of Nevada's Ruby Mountains, further illustrating its commitment to environmental conservation.
View original story
Significant decrease (>10%) • 25%
Minor decrease (<5%) • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Moderate decrease (5-10%) • 25%
Decrease by 5-10% • 25%
Decrease by more than 10% • 25%
Decrease by less than 5% • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increase • 25%
Decrease • 25%
No Change • 25%
Uncertain • 25%
Increase • 25%
Data not available • 25%
No change • 25%
Decrease • 25%
Significant positive impact • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Moderate positive impact • 25%
Negative impact • 25%
Ban fully overturned • 25%
Ban modified but in effect • 25%
Ban remains in effect • 25%
Ban partially overturned • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Significant negative impact • 25%
Moderate negative impact • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Increased support • 25%
Increased opposition • 25%
Decreased opposition • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decrease • 25%
Increase by over 10% • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increase by 5-10% • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Insufficient data • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Divided opinion • 25%
Strong bipartisan support • 25%
Strong opposition from Republicans • 25%
Largely ignored • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Federal Court Challenge • 25%
Both Federal and State Challenges • 25%
No Challenge • 25%
State Court Challenge • 25%